Day 41

False advertising

May 6th, 2010



There are physical limits to what can reasonably be considered a shoe.


7 Comments

  1. Chris says:

    You clearly never sang nursery rhymes as a child.

  2. Cameron Day says:

    That’s awesome! I have a lake house literally 1 mile away from Pilccher’s shoes! And honestly that’s funny on their sign because they have a little museum in their shoe store of special shoes they’ve made in the past. There’s like a size 20 shoe they had to make! hahahah

    Keep on going man!

    -Cameron Day, Westfield,IN

  3. Cameron Day says:

    That’s awesome! I have a lake house literally 1 mile away from Pilccher’s shoes! And honestly that’s funny on their sign because they have a little museum in their shoe store of special shoes they’ve made in the past. There’s like a size 20 shoe they had to make! hahahah

    Keep on going man!

    -Cameron Day, Westfield,IN

    btw, here’s the building haha, it’s been there forever it has ivy all over it
    http://www.pilchersshoes.net/Welcome_files/shapeimage_3.jpg

  4. Karen says:

    Is there a physical limit to what can reasonably be considered a foot? What is your definition of reasonably? Of considered, and…? :-)

    • Karen Too says:

      (I began reading this blog from the start on May 28th, which is when I first heard about it.

      Not long from now, I noticed another “Karen,” so I added the word “Too” to my name. Now, I’m going back to add a note about this to my early posts as just Karen so it’s clear that these posts here are from me, Karen Too.

      Silly, perhaps, but thought people should be able to tell the difference, and the other Karen was here first.)

  5. Bob Currie says:

    I’m thinking we were blessed, or possibly cursed, with the same sense of humor :) According to Google at this point in time a size 37 AA would be the physical limit of what could reasonably be considered a shoe.

Leave a Reply